With too much time on my hands and too small pouches of tuna in my cart, I felt obliged to write to Bumble Bee Tuna to express my views. Here is my letter:
Something’s fishy with Bumble Bee Tuna.
Or is this just a corporate downsizing?
I was surprised and disappointed when I went to my local supermarket yesterday and found that the “Individual Size” 3 ounce pouch of Premium Albacore Tuna in Water had morphed into what you are now calling the “Single Serve” 2.5 ounce pouch. Was the “Individual Size” supposed to be more than a single serving? Were people complaining because the 3 ounce size was too large?
Though the amount of tuna in the pouch has diminished, the total fat and the calories from fat have actually increased, from 1.5 grams to 2 grams and from 10 calories to 20 calories, respectively. Naturally, with the decrease in size, the amount of protein has also gone down, from 19 grams to 16 grams. None of this is good news from a nutritional standpoint.
One thing that has not gone down is the cost of the product. Yesterday it was on sale at Stop & Shop for $1.67 a pouch, which is more than I have paid in the past for the larger size. I also couldn’t help but notice the absence of any text on the package trumpeting this new size. Nothing that said, “New, smaller size, same price” appeared anywhere. I was smart enough to immediately spot the difference, and, being a tuna lover and devoted Bumble Bee user, I bought it anyway. But my favorite brand has let me down.
Some background on my 55+ years of brand loyalty is in order (I’m not counting the first 3-4 years of my life, when I can’t say definitively that I ate BBT).
Growing up, I ate Bumble Bee Tuna almost every day for lunch. Back in those days kids walked home from school for lunch, and each day my Bumble Bee Tuna sandwich awaited me. BBT on white bread, no mayo – ever. God forbid my mother ran out of Bumble Bee. She would canvas the neighborhood, begging for a can. Sometimes she was desperate and had to commit the unforgivable sin of borrowing a can of Chicken of the Sea or even – dare I say it ? – Starkist. Blasphemy, I declared (though not with that word; I was too young to know that word at the time). I could tell immediately that the tuna was not Bumble Bee, and before Mom could appeal for mercy, I was checking the garbage can, looking for the miscreant can. I ate Bumble Bee Tuna every day for two years before even I got sick of it and asked for a baloney sandwich one day. The next day I was back to Bumble Bee, and I continued to eat my BBT sandwiches throughout my school days. Maybe that’s why the kids called me Tina Tuna. Not that I minded.
When I went to college, Mom stopped buying so much Bumble Bee. Even the supermarket cashier noticed and asked her about it one day. She explained that I was away at school. Whenever I’d be coming home, she’d restock, and the cashier would always say to her, “Oh, your daughter must be home from college.” And yes, we lived in a small town, with one supermarket.
During my working career, I often brought a can with me and made my own lunch. I couldn’t be sure the tuna our company cafeteria served was Bumble Bee, and I wouldn’t eat any other brand, or – God forbid – tuna salad. Bumble Bee is the only tuna for me. Now I am retired, and when I am around the house for lunch, only one thing pops into my mind: A Bumble Bee Tuna sandwich. Old habits die hard.
So you can see that my lifetime of brand loyalty would lead me to an even greater letdown than the casual Bumble Bee user, knowing that the diminished size of the product means less of it to enjoy. Two packets would definitely be too much for a sandwich, as would the 7 ounce size. (I never like leftover tuna, so opening the larger size and using it twice would be out of the question for me.) I suppose I could scour the local grocery stores and try to corner the market on the 3 ounce size, but I shouldn’t have to resort to that. In the back of my mind, I can’t help feeling disheartened by this diminution. The least you could have done was call me to let me know…
Finally, through my tears and disappointment, I have to ask: Did you really think you were fooling the consumer by calling this the “Single-Serve” size instead of the “Individual Size?” Oh, Bumble Bee, to turn on me after 55 years! I may have to drown my sorrows in a grilled cheese sandwich.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Driving Miss Daisy Crazy - April, 2009
I am going to say this with as much love, diplomacy and political correctness as I can muster:
Run for your life! Head for the hills! Stay off the roads!
Brandon Tillman has just gotten his driving permit.
Brandon, my favorite 16-year old nephew (OK, he’s my only official nephew, but he is a favorite person in my life), is now driving the streets of Hillsborough, “permitted” to drive with a licensed adult until he takes and passes his driving test at age 17 next March. Meanwhile, the rolling hills and broad thoroughfares feel just a tad less safe these days.
But why, you ask. As a veteran video gamer, he has superb eye-hand coordination. I drive, and I can’t get through even one song on Guitar Hero, while he goes to the advanced level. His powers of concentration are beyond reproach. When he is watching something on TV or playing a video game, you can talk to him, yell, stomp or whistle a happy tune in the same room with him, within five feet of his perch on the couch, and he won’t even notice you are there (though he can hear a package of cookies open in the next room without even turning down the volume on the TV). So why the worry?
Like most members of his generation, he grew up thinking that if you run the car off the road and crash into a brick wall, you just start the game over. No mention of insurance, no less bodily harm, in video games. Filled with the braggadocio of most 16-year olds, he fears nothing and is always certain he is right. Except that now he’ll be driving in a car owned by Mom or Dad, both of whom will be instructing him where to turn and what to do. Finally, Brandon and his best friends are all just getting their permits, which means a lot of 16-year olds are out for a drive these days. I know them all, and I sense trouble here.
I went to see him after his return from mandatory lesson one with the local driving school. “How did it go?” I inquired breezily, resisting the urge to ask if he had hit anything or anyone. “Fine,” he assured me, adding, “I wasn’t so great with K-turns.” K-turns, I thought. Who cares about K-turns? Make that turn as often as you want, but just don’t try it on the highway, I said to myself.
My fear worsened when I learned that his question to his mother (my favorite sister) after lesson two involved whether the wind can cause the car to drift to the right. Wind? On a street in town? It’s not like he’s on the autobahn. Why is he drifting to the right?
My sister has let him drive locally, carefully steering him through safe routes, avoiding problematic left-hand turns and narrow streets. She provides me with detailed accounts of their outings and I listen eagerly, agreeing on the selections she has made and praising her for her patience and planning. “Let’s just say,” she recounted after one such session, “that if a car had been in the other lane when we turned, we probably would have hit it. In fact, if a bike had been in the bike lane, he would have hit that.” Still, just taking him out driving is a big step for my sister, who kept him in a car seat for so long that I wondered if he’d still be in the backseat during driver’s ed class. The first time he got into the front seat of my car I thought he was pulling a fast one on me. “Are you sure Mom said you can ride in the front now?” I inquired. “I talk to her every day and she never announced this new policy to me,” I added dubiously. I think he was 13 at the time. My sister to this day insists that the regulation for keeping him in a car seat or at least in the back seat was based on height and weight, not age. In that case, she should still be in the backseat.
The other day my sister foolishly suggested they go to Friendly’s for dinner, forgetting momentarily that the trip requires an eight-mile drive down busy Route 206 – at rush hour, no less. (For those not from the area, let me just say that if you live in Hillsborough, your main goal in life is to avoid 206 as much as possible.) Despite her error in judgment, she allowed Brandon to drive. You’d have to know my sister to understand that letting him drive is tantamount to agreeing to jump out of an airplane – parachute or no parachute. She tried to conceal her anxiety, but a permanently clenched jaw and one simple but audible gasp gave it away. He didn’t wreck the car, but their relationship is now on a pretty rocky road, and I don’t mean 206.
His father’s approach is somewhat different from Mom’s. When she asked him how Brandon did, he summed it up succinctly, with no accounting of the route, how the turns went, the adherence to a plan or the speed limit. “Fine,” he declared.
I’m guessing Brandon prefers Dad’s approach, particularly since he pleaded with me, “T, don’t let Mom drive with me anymore.” You’ll be down to one parent then, I reminded him, asserting in a non-stated way that I wasn’t planning to substitute for either parent as a driving instructor any time soon. So far I have remained above the fray, my Mercedes conveniently resting in sick bay until I can get it to the dealership for repairs. My other car, my Sebring convertible – otherwise referred to by my sister as “the deathtrap” – probably will be deemed unacceptable for driver’s ed. So at least for now, I won’t be found clenching my fists and slamming on imaginary brakes while Brandon drives with me.
Nonetheless, it will all be over next year at this time, when he will be 17 and licensed to drive on his own. Venture out at your own risk.
Tina Gordon, April, 2009
Run for your life! Head for the hills! Stay off the roads!
Brandon Tillman has just gotten his driving permit.
Brandon, my favorite 16-year old nephew (OK, he’s my only official nephew, but he is a favorite person in my life), is now driving the streets of Hillsborough, “permitted” to drive with a licensed adult until he takes and passes his driving test at age 17 next March. Meanwhile, the rolling hills and broad thoroughfares feel just a tad less safe these days.
But why, you ask. As a veteran video gamer, he has superb eye-hand coordination. I drive, and I can’t get through even one song on Guitar Hero, while he goes to the advanced level. His powers of concentration are beyond reproach. When he is watching something on TV or playing a video game, you can talk to him, yell, stomp or whistle a happy tune in the same room with him, within five feet of his perch on the couch, and he won’t even notice you are there (though he can hear a package of cookies open in the next room without even turning down the volume on the TV). So why the worry?
Like most members of his generation, he grew up thinking that if you run the car off the road and crash into a brick wall, you just start the game over. No mention of insurance, no less bodily harm, in video games. Filled with the braggadocio of most 16-year olds, he fears nothing and is always certain he is right. Except that now he’ll be driving in a car owned by Mom or Dad, both of whom will be instructing him where to turn and what to do. Finally, Brandon and his best friends are all just getting their permits, which means a lot of 16-year olds are out for a drive these days. I know them all, and I sense trouble here.
I went to see him after his return from mandatory lesson one with the local driving school. “How did it go?” I inquired breezily, resisting the urge to ask if he had hit anything or anyone. “Fine,” he assured me, adding, “I wasn’t so great with K-turns.” K-turns, I thought. Who cares about K-turns? Make that turn as often as you want, but just don’t try it on the highway, I said to myself.
My fear worsened when I learned that his question to his mother (my favorite sister) after lesson two involved whether the wind can cause the car to drift to the right. Wind? On a street in town? It’s not like he’s on the autobahn. Why is he drifting to the right?
My sister has let him drive locally, carefully steering him through safe routes, avoiding problematic left-hand turns and narrow streets. She provides me with detailed accounts of their outings and I listen eagerly, agreeing on the selections she has made and praising her for her patience and planning. “Let’s just say,” she recounted after one such session, “that if a car had been in the other lane when we turned, we probably would have hit it. In fact, if a bike had been in the bike lane, he would have hit that.” Still, just taking him out driving is a big step for my sister, who kept him in a car seat for so long that I wondered if he’d still be in the backseat during driver’s ed class. The first time he got into the front seat of my car I thought he was pulling a fast one on me. “Are you sure Mom said you can ride in the front now?” I inquired. “I talk to her every day and she never announced this new policy to me,” I added dubiously. I think he was 13 at the time. My sister to this day insists that the regulation for keeping him in a car seat or at least in the back seat was based on height and weight, not age. In that case, she should still be in the backseat.
The other day my sister foolishly suggested they go to Friendly’s for dinner, forgetting momentarily that the trip requires an eight-mile drive down busy Route 206 – at rush hour, no less. (For those not from the area, let me just say that if you live in Hillsborough, your main goal in life is to avoid 206 as much as possible.) Despite her error in judgment, she allowed Brandon to drive. You’d have to know my sister to understand that letting him drive is tantamount to agreeing to jump out of an airplane – parachute or no parachute. She tried to conceal her anxiety, but a permanently clenched jaw and one simple but audible gasp gave it away. He didn’t wreck the car, but their relationship is now on a pretty rocky road, and I don’t mean 206.
His father’s approach is somewhat different from Mom’s. When she asked him how Brandon did, he summed it up succinctly, with no accounting of the route, how the turns went, the adherence to a plan or the speed limit. “Fine,” he declared.
I’m guessing Brandon prefers Dad’s approach, particularly since he pleaded with me, “T, don’t let Mom drive with me anymore.” You’ll be down to one parent then, I reminded him, asserting in a non-stated way that I wasn’t planning to substitute for either parent as a driving instructor any time soon. So far I have remained above the fray, my Mercedes conveniently resting in sick bay until I can get it to the dealership for repairs. My other car, my Sebring convertible – otherwise referred to by my sister as “the deathtrap” – probably will be deemed unacceptable for driver’s ed. So at least for now, I won’t be found clenching my fists and slamming on imaginary brakes while Brandon drives with me.
Nonetheless, it will all be over next year at this time, when he will be 17 and licensed to drive on his own. Venture out at your own risk.
Tina Gordon, April, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Cat Tales - March, 2009
Marlin Perkins I'm not. I don't enjoy animals and, as you may have heard me say before, the only pets I have are peeves. I find the adoration of Mickey Mouse repugnant; the only mouse I like is the tiny one connected to my mini-laptop. Nonetheless, when one of my dear friends (MDF) travels, I am the back-up cat caretaker who pinch hits for the primary caretaker who fills in when MDF is gone. I think of it as Kitty Meals on Wheels for MDF's cherished feline friends. Though it is not something I relish doing – after all, who enjoys cleaning the kitty litter? – it's one of those things we do for our friends, knowing that they would do something of equal value for us.
I'm not sure her cats think of it in quite that way.
MDF has two cats, or at least that's what she tells me. I've only seen one cat, and not often at that. I consider the second cat the "concept cat." Initially I was afraid that the cats would escape when I opened the front door. How would I explain to the authorities that two cats got out but I could only describe one? And are there authorities to whom to report a missing cat, or would I have to fabricate a description on a flier to be placed on telephone poles around the neighborhood? "Missing cat. Four legs, two ears, two eyes, you figure out the rest."
Apparently, cats have a keen sense about people and can tell if you like them. MDF's cats' senses kick in when I park the car outside her house. When I first started going, Cat #1 got a glimpse of me and took off like a cat out of hell, somehow dematerializing herself through the balusters and down the stairs to hightail it to the basement. After my subsequent visits, she wised up, figuring out that I was like the pizza delivery guy: My showing up meant dinner was being served. She gradually grew less fearful but no less full of disdain. I'd come in and she might take a quick look. Once she even approached me, rolling over on her back. My cat fan friends explained that was a good sign, one of rapprochement: She wanted me to pet her and establish a rapport. But I'm not interested in heavy petting, I explained to them. "For God's sake, just pet her. She's probably lonely," someone exhorted. So, the next time, I approached her as a sign of good faith, but she pulled away, just teasing me with what I had taken as a friendly overture. So much for rapprochement.
Even though I barely or rarely see the cats, I know that they know I am there. They like to leave me little messages in the form of deposits on the carpet that should have been made in the litter box. To be sure that I don't miss these messages, they ever so considerately deposit them right in front of the door. I can almost hear them saying, "When's our real mommy coming home?"
I have my little routine. I come in and loudly announce, "Aunt Tina's here. Are there any cats here today?" I figure that ought to be enough of a warning to get them out of sight, so I don't frighten them and they don't startle me.
Then I go into the kitchen, where MDF has left the cans of cat food on the counter. I put out two cans for each cat and a final can, sort of an appetizer, I assume, that they share (or at least I hope so; it's not like I have actually observed them eating). I dutifully serve the delectable offerings – seafood medley, turkey with giblet gravy (always on Thanksgiving), chicken medley, salmon medley and the other varieties. My sensory abilities apparently are lacking; they all look and smell the same to me. My theory is that the factory packs exactly the same stuff in each can, changing only the label. Can't fool me, but the cats clearly don't agree. Once they barely touched their food. I wasn't sure whether they were on a hunger strike to protest MDF's absence or if they had finally rejected the canned stuff. At least I'm not required to serve specially cooked meals or eat there myself and let them feed off the table scraps. Now that I am retired, I can do my kitty Meals on Wheels duty during the afternoon. I guess having their main meal at 3ish seems early, but they can think of it as tea and crumpets, only in this case the crumpets are salmon medley.
After the food and beverages have been served, I get to tackle the litter box (though I’d rather litter a tackle box). I feel like I am panning for gold as I sift through the sandy substance, looking for waste products. Cats, I am told, are very clean creatures, so they want their toilet facilities swept clear of waste products. As much as I hope I find little or nothing in the box, when I don't, I worry. Are they OK? Their little bodies (I imagine) are small, and they should process waste daily. Should I be concerned about cat constipation? After all, that could prove to be catastrophic. I was glad to learn after a few days of finding nothing that an auxiliary litter box is in the basement, beyond my jurisdiction. Thank God they are taking care of business somewhere else.
The feeding done, the kitty litter unlittered, the water bowls refreshed, the mail and newspapers retrieved and sorted neatly on the dining room table and my work is done. No heavy petting required – thank God.
I had goldfish once when I was about 6 or 7. I forgot to feed them, so they died. And someone trusts me to care for her pets? She must be catatonic!
I'm not sure her cats think of it in quite that way.
MDF has two cats, or at least that's what she tells me. I've only seen one cat, and not often at that. I consider the second cat the "concept cat." Initially I was afraid that the cats would escape when I opened the front door. How would I explain to the authorities that two cats got out but I could only describe one? And are there authorities to whom to report a missing cat, or would I have to fabricate a description on a flier to be placed on telephone poles around the neighborhood? "Missing cat. Four legs, two ears, two eyes, you figure out the rest."
Apparently, cats have a keen sense about people and can tell if you like them. MDF's cats' senses kick in when I park the car outside her house. When I first started going, Cat #1 got a glimpse of me and took off like a cat out of hell, somehow dematerializing herself through the balusters and down the stairs to hightail it to the basement. After my subsequent visits, she wised up, figuring out that I was like the pizza delivery guy: My showing up meant dinner was being served. She gradually grew less fearful but no less full of disdain. I'd come in and she might take a quick look. Once she even approached me, rolling over on her back. My cat fan friends explained that was a good sign, one of rapprochement: She wanted me to pet her and establish a rapport. But I'm not interested in heavy petting, I explained to them. "For God's sake, just pet her. She's probably lonely," someone exhorted. So, the next time, I approached her as a sign of good faith, but she pulled away, just teasing me with what I had taken as a friendly overture. So much for rapprochement.
Even though I barely or rarely see the cats, I know that they know I am there. They like to leave me little messages in the form of deposits on the carpet that should have been made in the litter box. To be sure that I don't miss these messages, they ever so considerately deposit them right in front of the door. I can almost hear them saying, "When's our real mommy coming home?"
I have my little routine. I come in and loudly announce, "Aunt Tina's here. Are there any cats here today?" I figure that ought to be enough of a warning to get them out of sight, so I don't frighten them and they don't startle me.
Then I go into the kitchen, where MDF has left the cans of cat food on the counter. I put out two cans for each cat and a final can, sort of an appetizer, I assume, that they share (or at least I hope so; it's not like I have actually observed them eating). I dutifully serve the delectable offerings – seafood medley, turkey with giblet gravy (always on Thanksgiving), chicken medley, salmon medley and the other varieties. My sensory abilities apparently are lacking; they all look and smell the same to me. My theory is that the factory packs exactly the same stuff in each can, changing only the label. Can't fool me, but the cats clearly don't agree. Once they barely touched their food. I wasn't sure whether they were on a hunger strike to protest MDF's absence or if they had finally rejected the canned stuff. At least I'm not required to serve specially cooked meals or eat there myself and let them feed off the table scraps. Now that I am retired, I can do my kitty Meals on Wheels duty during the afternoon. I guess having their main meal at 3ish seems early, but they can think of it as tea and crumpets, only in this case the crumpets are salmon medley.
After the food and beverages have been served, I get to tackle the litter box (though I’d rather litter a tackle box). I feel like I am panning for gold as I sift through the sandy substance, looking for waste products. Cats, I am told, are very clean creatures, so they want their toilet facilities swept clear of waste products. As much as I hope I find little or nothing in the box, when I don't, I worry. Are they OK? Their little bodies (I imagine) are small, and they should process waste daily. Should I be concerned about cat constipation? After all, that could prove to be catastrophic. I was glad to learn after a few days of finding nothing that an auxiliary litter box is in the basement, beyond my jurisdiction. Thank God they are taking care of business somewhere else.
The feeding done, the kitty litter unlittered, the water bowls refreshed, the mail and newspapers retrieved and sorted neatly on the dining room table and my work is done. No heavy petting required – thank God.
I had goldfish once when I was about 6 or 7. I forgot to feed them, so they died. And someone trusts me to care for her pets? She must be catatonic!
Monday, March 2, 2009
Face It - February, 2009
My BFF has a way of cutting to the chase. If she had been in “The Wizard of Oz,” she would have been the first person to look behind the screen and announce that there was just an ordinary guy back there, not some wizard. She took the same kind of view of Facebook, the popular social networking website that links friends together, and summed it up with a succinct, “Who cares?”
She has a point.
After all, we live in a culture where too much information (TMI) abounds. When someone inquires, “How are you?” or “How was your weekend?” what they really want to hear is “Fine,” not that you had your boil lanced or that the relatives came over and Uncle Elmer fell asleep in your favorite chair.
Then along comes Facebook, where never have so many said so much about so little.
Facebook demands to know what you are doing now. Right this minute. C’mon, give it up. And so people feel compelled to fill in that blank. If you ever think your life is dull, just sign on and you’ll feel at least as interesting as your “friends” on Facebook. Facebook is like a confessional, and people decide to proclaim their crankiness on any particular day. For every person training to be a museum docent, there are 10 people who are “stuck in traffic,” “exhausted,” “reading the paper and having a cup of tea,” or doing something equally compelling. See, your life’s not so bad.
And then there is the issue of “friends” and the etiquette of the medium. You have to request that someone be your friend, so you get requests from people who were in your first grade class, who worked with you 10 years ago or who kind of know you through someone else. In the real world, almost none of these people is likely to have your home phone number and talk to you on a regular basis – or at all. Oh, sure, it was kind of, maybe, a little interesting to hear that the guy from first grade is now a grandfather, but that just made me feel old. Maybe I’ll see him at a high school reunion someday, but until then, thanks to Facebook, I’ll be advised each time he goes to In-N-Out Burger and shares that information.
And speaking of friends, what if you don’t want to be friends with someone? You can ignore the friend request, but is that a breach of on-line etiquette (paging Miss Manners, Miss Manners, please report immediately)? The problem is, every friend I have also has friends, so each time Mary becomes friends with Eleanor, I see that on my screen. I kind of know Mary but have no idea who Eleanor is, so why should I care what she has to say? And then there are the people who go on-line 10 times a day and tell you what they are doing, invite you to stuff and promote their own personal and political causes. I actually “defriended” someone whose constant proselytizing bugged me – but she’ll never know (or so I am told). Finally, looking at the time stamp associated with each entry (17 minutes ago), I have to wonder: Is anyone actually working out there? Shouldn’t most of you who are stuck in traffic on your way to work be working when you finally get to the office? I smell a Facebook addiction here.
I had a comment from someone about my photo and how I hadn’t aged a bit. Are you kidding? First of all, yes, in fact, I have, but thanks for lying, and second, the picture was taken at least five years and 30 pounds ago. Do you really think I’d post a picture that makes me look like I actually look?
The latest Facebook fad is “25 Random Things About Me,” where you and your friends list 25 random things. Note that these are random things, not necessarily interesting things. In my list (yes, I succumbed), I included such juicy tidbits as: “I make my bed as soon as I get up,” “I only eat Bumble Bee brand tuna,” and “I can make a loud noise with my tongue that amuses young children.” Wow, aren’t you glad you know these fascinating things about me?
Some good can come from Facebook. When my 15-year old nephew’s cell phone died, he used Facebook to get contact information from his friends, who responded in nanoseconds (he also told me not to send him a friend request because I was not about to be included among his hundreds of friends and associates). You can ask for restaurant suggestions, vacation ideas or good books to read. You can take pop culture quizzes on movies and TV shows, post links to websites you like, or share pictures from your vacation, assuming anyone will want to see them, that is. I have compared movies with people with similar tastes and have heeded their suggestions. So you actually can share useful information.
So in the end, Facebook provides what amounts to the on-line version of the conversations I used to have in the elevator going to the office, except with much less emphasis on the weather. In other words, small talk – some interesting, some not so interesting, most completely unnecessary but occasionally amusing. But if your entry for the day is, “I’m tired,” then assume my response won’t be, “Thanks for sharing.”
She has a point.
After all, we live in a culture where too much information (TMI) abounds. When someone inquires, “How are you?” or “How was your weekend?” what they really want to hear is “Fine,” not that you had your boil lanced or that the relatives came over and Uncle Elmer fell asleep in your favorite chair.
Then along comes Facebook, where never have so many said so much about so little.
Facebook demands to know what you are doing now. Right this minute. C’mon, give it up. And so people feel compelled to fill in that blank. If you ever think your life is dull, just sign on and you’ll feel at least as interesting as your “friends” on Facebook. Facebook is like a confessional, and people decide to proclaim their crankiness on any particular day. For every person training to be a museum docent, there are 10 people who are “stuck in traffic,” “exhausted,” “reading the paper and having a cup of tea,” or doing something equally compelling. See, your life’s not so bad.
And then there is the issue of “friends” and the etiquette of the medium. You have to request that someone be your friend, so you get requests from people who were in your first grade class, who worked with you 10 years ago or who kind of know you through someone else. In the real world, almost none of these people is likely to have your home phone number and talk to you on a regular basis – or at all. Oh, sure, it was kind of, maybe, a little interesting to hear that the guy from first grade is now a grandfather, but that just made me feel old. Maybe I’ll see him at a high school reunion someday, but until then, thanks to Facebook, I’ll be advised each time he goes to In-N-Out Burger and shares that information.
And speaking of friends, what if you don’t want to be friends with someone? You can ignore the friend request, but is that a breach of on-line etiquette (paging Miss Manners, Miss Manners, please report immediately)? The problem is, every friend I have also has friends, so each time Mary becomes friends with Eleanor, I see that on my screen. I kind of know Mary but have no idea who Eleanor is, so why should I care what she has to say? And then there are the people who go on-line 10 times a day and tell you what they are doing, invite you to stuff and promote their own personal and political causes. I actually “defriended” someone whose constant proselytizing bugged me – but she’ll never know (or so I am told). Finally, looking at the time stamp associated with each entry (17 minutes ago), I have to wonder: Is anyone actually working out there? Shouldn’t most of you who are stuck in traffic on your way to work be working when you finally get to the office? I smell a Facebook addiction here.
I had a comment from someone about my photo and how I hadn’t aged a bit. Are you kidding? First of all, yes, in fact, I have, but thanks for lying, and second, the picture was taken at least five years and 30 pounds ago. Do you really think I’d post a picture that makes me look like I actually look?
The latest Facebook fad is “25 Random Things About Me,” where you and your friends list 25 random things. Note that these are random things, not necessarily interesting things. In my list (yes, I succumbed), I included such juicy tidbits as: “I make my bed as soon as I get up,” “I only eat Bumble Bee brand tuna,” and “I can make a loud noise with my tongue that amuses young children.” Wow, aren’t you glad you know these fascinating things about me?
Some good can come from Facebook. When my 15-year old nephew’s cell phone died, he used Facebook to get contact information from his friends, who responded in nanoseconds (he also told me not to send him a friend request because I was not about to be included among his hundreds of friends and associates). You can ask for restaurant suggestions, vacation ideas or good books to read. You can take pop culture quizzes on movies and TV shows, post links to websites you like, or share pictures from your vacation, assuming anyone will want to see them, that is. I have compared movies with people with similar tastes and have heeded their suggestions. So you actually can share useful information.
So in the end, Facebook provides what amounts to the on-line version of the conversations I used to have in the elevator going to the office, except with much less emphasis on the weather. In other words, small talk – some interesting, some not so interesting, most completely unnecessary but occasionally amusing. But if your entry for the day is, “I’m tired,” then assume my response won’t be, “Thanks for sharing.”
Monday, February 23, 2009
'Roid Rage - February, 2009
*“I've been cheated
Been mistreated…”
When I hear the term ‘roid, my first thought is hemorrhoids. I’m at THAT age, you know. When the term is applied to steroids, it is usually in the context of treatment for some serious ailment afflicting a friend or acquaintance.
Now when I think of ‘roids, I’ll simply think: A-Rod. Or A-Roid.
*“I've been made blue
I've been lied to…”
The “truth” is out: Alex Rodriguez, New York Yankee, likely Hall of Fame baseball player and the highest paid athlete in his sport, used steroids while playing for Texas from 2001-2003.
Or so he says.
Signing the biggest contract at that time, A-Rod says he felt pressure to perform and took a few things – some of which you can buy at GNC, he claims – to enhance his performance. “I wanted to prove to everyone that I was worth being one of the greatest players of all time.” Now he is “deeply sorry and regretful,” he tells us. “I’m sorry for that time and sorry to my fans,” he says. I don’t need any of that, he claims.
And why should we believe him? Was it really only 2001-2003 that he used these substances? Is he sorry he used performance-enhancing drugs? Or is he sorry he was outed by Sports Illustrated? Sorry for the act, sorry he got caught, or sorry he lied about the whole thing?
He was “stupid and naïve,” he says, not knowing what he was using. Why would a world class athlete whose livelihood depends on the health of his body take something he knew nothing about? Does that make any sense? He stopped using the pills, injectables in 2003 following an injury. So we are now to believe that he stopped in 2003. And signing the biggest contract ever with the New York Yankees in 2004, where the pressure to perform is immeasurably greater than in Texas, where he formerly played, didn’t make him feel that he had to enhance his performance by taking just a little something extra?
Maybe he should have. He certainly didn’t come through in the clutch in any post-season with New York.
While Barry Bonds faces jail if convicted of lying to federal authorities, while Mark McGwire is permanently ensconced in the Hall of Shame, while Roger Clemens goes before Congress and fiercely defends himself, we are supposed to feel better that at least Alex Rodriguez is a stand-up guy. He admitted steroid use and that he lied.
Kind of.
With this behavior – taking illegal, banned substances and then lying about them until he was caught – what message are we sending to society and especially to young athletes and kids in general? That it is OK to do something you know is either wrong or illegal and then lie about it as long as you later admit your guilt and say you want to put it all behind you?
A-Rod followed up his first interview with a press conference at the Yankees’ spring training complex. Here he provided more details, mostly along the order of “the dog ate my homework,” only for A-Rod it was the story of how his unnamed cousin – surely the stars of this drug-related “Dumb and Dumber” – injected him for three years with something available OTC in the Dominican Republic (it turns out – schock! that the substance was not available in the DR OTC, by the way). He wasn’t sure they were using it right or even if he realized any benefit from using the substance, but he continued getting shots from My Cousin Vinny for three years.
Why should we believe Alex Rodriguez now? Unless he pledges to take drug tests randomly and make the results public each time so we know he’s clean. Meanwhile, whatever A-Rod allegedly took is illegal. Was it banned at the time? Well, it was illegal, and shouldn’t that be enough?
Why do we care if athletes want to abuse their bodies? After all, isn’t their intention to perform better so their team can win and they can become champions? They are willing to risk it all in the long term for short term results. Isn’t that their prerogative? If so, why does it bother us?
Because they cheat. Because they lie. And because, as a society, we feel let down. Our standards are falling. People can cheat and lie, later admit it and we are supposed to forgive them for the transgressions because they finally spoke the truth.
Unfortunately, I can’t be so forgiving. But what I can do, from now on, is never believe anyone who denies doing something wrong, says he is sorry he did something wrong and that he/she will never do it again. I won’t believe anyone from now on.
*“I've been made blue
I've been lied to…”
When A-Rod took his performance-enhancing drugs and lied about it and then admitted it, he took away my inherent belief in the good of people. Now I feel stupid and naïve. And isn’t that a shame?
*Linda Ronstadt – “When Will I Be Loved?”
Been mistreated…”
When I hear the term ‘roid, my first thought is hemorrhoids. I’m at THAT age, you know. When the term is applied to steroids, it is usually in the context of treatment for some serious ailment afflicting a friend or acquaintance.
Now when I think of ‘roids, I’ll simply think: A-Rod. Or A-Roid.
*“I've been made blue
I've been lied to…”
The “truth” is out: Alex Rodriguez, New York Yankee, likely Hall of Fame baseball player and the highest paid athlete in his sport, used steroids while playing for Texas from 2001-2003.
Or so he says.
Signing the biggest contract at that time, A-Rod says he felt pressure to perform and took a few things – some of which you can buy at GNC, he claims – to enhance his performance. “I wanted to prove to everyone that I was worth being one of the greatest players of all time.” Now he is “deeply sorry and regretful,” he tells us. “I’m sorry for that time and sorry to my fans,” he says. I don’t need any of that, he claims.
And why should we believe him? Was it really only 2001-2003 that he used these substances? Is he sorry he used performance-enhancing drugs? Or is he sorry he was outed by Sports Illustrated? Sorry for the act, sorry he got caught, or sorry he lied about the whole thing?
He was “stupid and naïve,” he says, not knowing what he was using. Why would a world class athlete whose livelihood depends on the health of his body take something he knew nothing about? Does that make any sense? He stopped using the pills, injectables in 2003 following an injury. So we are now to believe that he stopped in 2003. And signing the biggest contract ever with the New York Yankees in 2004, where the pressure to perform is immeasurably greater than in Texas, where he formerly played, didn’t make him feel that he had to enhance his performance by taking just a little something extra?
Maybe he should have. He certainly didn’t come through in the clutch in any post-season with New York.
While Barry Bonds faces jail if convicted of lying to federal authorities, while Mark McGwire is permanently ensconced in the Hall of Shame, while Roger Clemens goes before Congress and fiercely defends himself, we are supposed to feel better that at least Alex Rodriguez is a stand-up guy. He admitted steroid use and that he lied.
Kind of.
With this behavior – taking illegal, banned substances and then lying about them until he was caught – what message are we sending to society and especially to young athletes and kids in general? That it is OK to do something you know is either wrong or illegal and then lie about it as long as you later admit your guilt and say you want to put it all behind you?
A-Rod followed up his first interview with a press conference at the Yankees’ spring training complex. Here he provided more details, mostly along the order of “the dog ate my homework,” only for A-Rod it was the story of how his unnamed cousin – surely the stars of this drug-related “Dumb and Dumber” – injected him for three years with something available OTC in the Dominican Republic (it turns out – schock! that the substance was not available in the DR OTC, by the way). He wasn’t sure they were using it right or even if he realized any benefit from using the substance, but he continued getting shots from My Cousin Vinny for three years.
Why should we believe Alex Rodriguez now? Unless he pledges to take drug tests randomly and make the results public each time so we know he’s clean. Meanwhile, whatever A-Rod allegedly took is illegal. Was it banned at the time? Well, it was illegal, and shouldn’t that be enough?
Why do we care if athletes want to abuse their bodies? After all, isn’t their intention to perform better so their team can win and they can become champions? They are willing to risk it all in the long term for short term results. Isn’t that their prerogative? If so, why does it bother us?
Because they cheat. Because they lie. And because, as a society, we feel let down. Our standards are falling. People can cheat and lie, later admit it and we are supposed to forgive them for the transgressions because they finally spoke the truth.
Unfortunately, I can’t be so forgiving. But what I can do, from now on, is never believe anyone who denies doing something wrong, says he is sorry he did something wrong and that he/she will never do it again. I won’t believe anyone from now on.
*“I've been made blue
I've been lied to…”
When A-Rod took his performance-enhancing drugs and lied about it and then admitted it, he took away my inherent belief in the good of people. Now I feel stupid and naïve. And isn’t that a shame?
*Linda Ronstadt – “When Will I Be Loved?”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)